|
|
1. What is the purpose of punishment?
2. Can I justify the defendant, when his term of detention longer term threatening punishment?
3. Can I justify the defendant for the reason: in his place I would have done the same, how is he?
4. Can a clean sheet defendant invoked to justify?
5. Can I put him in the guilt of immoral means of protection?
6. Can I justify the defendant, because his family threatened with poverty, if he is convicted?
7. Can you condemn a man who has killed another, to get rid of physical or mental torture by the dead?
8. Is it possible to justify a minor partner, on the grounds that the main culprit goes unpunished due to the negligence or misconduct of officials?
9. Can I justify the defendant when the crime was caused by unpunished crime officer with respect to the defendant himself, his family or a range of different persons?
The same eternal or painfully contemporary issues exist in the judicial sphere, for example:
1. Deserves a jury testimony more credible than the testimony without an oath?
2. What value can have for these process severe judicial errors of past times and other nations?
3. Do jurors the moral right to be with the first sentence to annul the proceedings if the Court investigation found that the conviction was quashed wrong?
4. Do the moral right to a jury acquittal due to prejudice, the presiding officer to the defendant?
5. Do they have a moral right to be with malicious perversion of the order of proceedings in the state and connected with it, the arbitrariness of prosecutorial and judicial uneven retribution? |
|